Powered by https://sitehealthcheck.net ()
health report : https://bringyourownlaptop.com
examined at : 25-01-14 01:08:24
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Powered by https://sitehealthcheck.net ()
examined at : 25-01-14 01:08:24
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Adobe tutorials by Daniel Walter Scott at Bring Your Own Laptop BYOL | Bring Your Own Laptop
Your page title exceeds 60 characters. It's not good.
This website is home to Daniel Walter Scott's Adobe tutorials. A mixture of free tutorials and paid content.
Your meta description does not exceed 150 characters. It's fine.
Your site do not have any meta keyword.
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| lessons | 100 | 2.19 % | No |
| hours | 97 | 2.124 % | No |
| × | 97 | 2.124 % | No |
| Intro | 96 | 2.102 % | No |
| projects | 90 | 1.971 % | No |
| achievement | 87 | 1.905 % | No |
| Certificate | 84 | 1.839 % | No |
| Essentials | 62 | 1.358 % | No |
| Adobe | 61 | 1.336 % | No |
| questions | 58 | 1.27 % | No |
| Training | 57 | 1.248 % | No |
| quiz | 54 | 1.182 % | No |
| CC | 49 | 1.073 % | No |
| courses | 28 | 0.613 % | No |
| Advanced | 28 | 0.613 % | No |
| Figma | 25 | 0.547 % | No |
| Design | 25 | 0.547 % | No |
| Photoshop | 25 | 0.547 % | No |
| Illustrator | 24 | 0.526 % | No |
| design | 24 | 0.526 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| hours Intro | 96 | 2.102 % | No |
| Intro × | 96 | 2.102 % | No |
| of achievement | 86 | 1.883 % | No |
| Certificate of | 84 | 1.839 % | No |
| projects Certificate | 83 | 1.817 % | No |
| × Adobe | 58 | 1.27 % | No |
| quiz questions | 54 | 1.182 % | No |
| Essentials Training | 40 | 0.876 % | No |
| lessons 12 | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| 12 hours | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| CC Essentials | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| lessons 16 | 21 | 0.46 % | No |
| 16 hours | 21 | 0.46 % | No |
| Adobe Photoshop | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| Photoshop CC | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| 21 projects | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| Adobe Illustrator | 17 | 0.372 % | No |
| Illustrator CC | 17 | 0.372 % | No |
| CC Advanced | 15 | 0.328 % | No |
| Premiere Pro | 14 | 0.307 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| hours Intro × | 96 | 2.102 % | No |
| Certificate of achievement | 84 | 1.839 % | No |
| projects Certificate of | 83 | 1.817 % | No |
| Intro × Adobe | 58 | 1.27 % | No |
| lessons 12 hours | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| 12 hours Intro | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| CC Essentials Training | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| lessons 16 hours | 21 | 0.46 % | No |
| 16 hours Intro | 21 | 0.46 % | No |
| × Adobe Photoshop | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| Adobe Photoshop CC | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| 21 projects Certificate | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| × Adobe Illustrator | 17 | 0.372 % | No |
| Adobe Illustrator CC | 17 | 0.372 % | No |
| 20 projects Certificate | 14 | 0.307 % | No |
| lessons 10 hours | 13 | 0.285 % | No |
| 10 hours Intro | 13 | 0.285 % | No |
| Intro × Figma | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| quiz questions 10 | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| questions 10 projects | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| projects Certificate of achievement | 83 | 1.817 % | No |
| hours Intro × Adobe | 58 | 1.27 % | No |
| lessons 12 hours Intro | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| 12 hours Intro × | 29 | 0.635 % | No |
| lessons 16 hours Intro | 21 | 0.46 % | No |
| 16 hours Intro × | 21 | 0.46 % | No |
| Intro × Adobe Photoshop | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| × Adobe Photoshop CC | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| 21 projects Certificate of | 20 | 0.438 % | No |
| Intro × Adobe Illustrator | 17 | 0.372 % | No |
| × Adobe Illustrator CC | 17 | 0.372 % | No |
| 20 projects Certificate of | 14 | 0.307 % | No |
| lessons 10 hours Intro | 13 | 0.285 % | No |
| 10 hours Intro × | 13 | 0.285 % | No |
| hours Intro × Figma | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| quiz questions 10 projects | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| questions 10 projects Certificate | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| 10 projects Certificate of | 12 | 0.263 % | No |
| 115 lessons 12 hours | 11 | 0.241 % | No |
| Adobe Illustrator CC Essentials | 11 | 0.241 % | No |
The most using keywords do not match with meta keywords.
Your site have sitemap
https://bringyourownlaptop.com/sitemap.xml
4567
Text/HTML Ratio Test : 20%
Your site have robot.txt
NoIndex : noindex directive is a meta tag value. noindex directive is for not to show your website on search engine results. You must not set ‘noindex’ as value in meta tags if you want to be your website on search engine result.
By default, a webpage is set to “index.” You should add a <meta name="robots" content="noindex" /> directive to a webpage in the <head> section of the HTML if you do not want search engines to crawl a given page and include it in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages).
DoFollow & NoFollow : nofollow directive is a meta tag value. Nofollow directive is for not to follow any links of your website by search engine bots. You must not set ‘nofollow’ as value in meta tags if you want follow your link by search engine bots.
By default, links are set to “follow.” You would set a link to “nofollow” in this way: <a href="http://www.example.com/" rel="nofollow">Anchor Text</a> if you want to suggest to Google that the hyperlink should not pass any link equity/SEO value to the link target.
Some links of your site are not SEO friendly.
Site failed plain text email test.1plain text email found.
Page have doc type.
Your site have 11 images without alt text.
Your site does not have any depreciated HTML tag.
HTML page size is > 100KB
GZIP compression is disabled.
Your site have 216 inline css.
Your site have 1 internal css.
Site failed micro data schema test.
| SL | Host | Class | TTL | Type | PRI | Target | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 298 | A | 172.67.73.29 | ||
| 2 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 298 | A | 104.26.14.96 | ||
| 3 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 298 | A | 104.26.15.96 | ||
| 4 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 86400 | NS | stan.ns.cloudflare.com | ||
| 5 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 86400 | NS | zoe.ns.cloudflare.com | ||
| 6 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 300 | AAAA | 2606:4700:20::ac43:491d | ||
| 7 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 300 | AAAA | 2606:4700:20::681a:e60 | ||
| 8 | bringyourownlaptop.com | IN | 300 | AAAA | 2606:4700:20::681a:f60 |
Site failed IP canonicalization test.
Site passed URL canonicalization test.
<link rel="canonical" href="https://mywebsite.com/home" /><link rel="canonical" href="https://www.mywebsite.com/home" />
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 1,010 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Potential savings of 1,493 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
76 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 1,030 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
1,050 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
2.2 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Potential savings of 356 KiB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 329 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 11 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 10,689 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
3.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
4 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
4,682 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 280 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Potential savings of 1,493 KiB
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
76 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 760 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
760 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
1.6 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Potential savings of 925 KiB
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 1,158 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 10 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 10,689 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
2.5 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
4 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
4,682 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
10 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More