Powered by https://sitehealthcheck.net ()
health report : https://goodjobcreations.jp/
examined at : 24-11-19 22:03:54
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Powered by https://sitehealthcheck.net ()
examined at : 24-11-19 22:03:54
follow recommendations of this health report to keep your site healthy
Home - Good Job Creations
Your page title does not exceed 60 characters. It's fine.
Your site do not have any meta description.
Your site do not have any meta keyword.
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| さらに詳しく | 16 | 23.529 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 | 14 | 20.588 % | No |
| 履歴書のアップロード | 11 | 16.176 % | No |
| 求職者向けサービス | 8 | 11.765 % | No |
| EN | 8 | 11.765 % | No |
| 私たちのチーム | 7 | 10.294 % | No |
| 求職者 | 7 | 10.294 % | No |
| 求人企業 | 7 | 10.294 % | No |
| リソース | 7 | 10.294 % | No |
| 企業様 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 企業情報 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 参加しませんか | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 仕事を探す | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 報酬プログラム | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| GJCのスタッフを確認する | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 女性のキャンペーン | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 新卒（しんそつ） | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 就職活動マニュアル | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 職業の種類 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| サービス | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| 求職者 求職者向けサービス | 7 | 10.294 % | No |
| 企業様 企業情報 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 企業情報 私たちのチーム | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 私たちのチーム 参加しませんか | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 参加しませんか 求職者 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求職者向けサービス 仕事を探す | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 仕事を探す 報酬プログラム | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 報酬プログラム 履歴書のアップロード | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 履歴書のアップロード GJCのスタッフを確認する | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 職業の種類 よくあるご質問 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求人企業 サービス | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| サービス 人材をリクエスト | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 人材をリクエスト よくあるご質問 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 リソース | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 人材のリクエスト 履歴書のアップロード | 5 | 7.353 % | No |
| 履歴書のアップロード EN | 5 | 7.353 % | No |
| GJCのスタッフを確認する 新卒（しんそつ） | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 新卒（しんそつ） 女性のキャンペーン | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 女性のキャンペーン 職業の種類 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 就職活動マニュアル | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| 企業様 企業情報 私たちのチーム | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 企業情報 私たちのチーム 参加しませんか | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 私たちのチーム 参加しませんか 求職者 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 参加しませんか 求職者 求職者向けサービス | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求職者 求職者向けサービス 仕事を探す | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求職者向けサービス 仕事を探す 報酬プログラム | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 仕事を探す 報酬プログラム 履歴書のアップロード | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 報酬プログラム 履歴書のアップロード GJCのスタッフを確認する | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求人企業 サービス 人材をリクエスト | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| サービス 人材をリクエスト よくあるご質問 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 人材をリクエスト よくあるご質問 リソース | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 人材のリクエスト 履歴書のアップロード EN | 5 | 7.353 % | No |
| 履歴書のアップロード GJCのスタッフを確認する 新卒（しんそつ） | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| GJCのスタッフを確認する 新卒（しんそつ） 女性のキャンペーン | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 新卒（しんそつ） 女性のキャンペーン 職業の種類 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 女性のキャンペーン 職業の種類 よくあるご質問 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 職業の種類 よくあるご質問 就職活動マニュアル | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 就職活動マニュアル 求人企業 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 就職活動マニュアル 求人企業 サービス | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 リソース 人材のリクエスト | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
|---|---|---|---|
| 企業様 企業情報 私たちのチーム 参加しませんか | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 企業情報 私たちのチーム 参加しませんか 求職者 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 私たちのチーム 参加しませんか 求職者 求職者向けサービス | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 参加しませんか 求職者 求職者向けサービス 仕事を探す | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求職者 求職者向けサービス 仕事を探す 報酬プログラム | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求職者向けサービス 仕事を探す 報酬プログラム 履歴書のアップロード | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 仕事を探す 報酬プログラム 履歴書のアップロード GJCのスタッフを確認する | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 求人企業 サービス 人材をリクエスト よくあるご質問 | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| サービス 人材をリクエスト よくあるご質問 リソース | 6 | 8.824 % | No |
| 報酬プログラム 履歴書のアップロード GJCのスタッフを確認する 新卒（しんそつ） | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 履歴書のアップロード GJCのスタッフを確認する 新卒（しんそつ） 女性のキャンペーン | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| GJCのスタッフを確認する 新卒（しんそつ） 女性のキャンペーン 職業の種類 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 新卒（しんそつ） 女性のキャンペーン 職業の種類 よくあるご質問 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 女性のキャンペーン 職業の種類 よくあるご質問 就職活動マニュアル | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 職業の種類 よくあるご質問 就職活動マニュアル 求人企業 | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 就職活動マニュアル 求人企業 サービス | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 就職活動マニュアル 求人企業 サービス 人材をリクエスト | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| 人材をリクエスト よくあるご質問 リソース 人材のリクエスト | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| よくあるご質問 リソース 人材のリクエスト 履歴書のアップロード | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
| リソース 人材のリクエスト 履歴書のアップロード EN | 4 | 5.882 % | No |
The most using keywords do not match with meta keywords.
Your site have sitemap
https://www.goodjobcreations.jp/sitemap_index.xml
68
Text/HTML Ratio Test : 6%
Your site have robot.txt
NoIndex : noindex directive is a meta tag value. noindex directive is for not to show your website on search engine results. You must not set ‘noindex’ as value in meta tags if you want to be your website on search engine result.
By default, a webpage is set to “index.” You should add a <meta name="robots" content="noindex" /> directive to a webpage in the <head> section of the HTML if you do not want search engines to crawl a given page and include it in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages).
DoFollow & NoFollow : nofollow directive is a meta tag value. Nofollow directive is for not to follow any links of your website by search engine bots. You must not set ‘nofollow’ as value in meta tags if you want follow your link by search engine bots.
By default, links are set to “follow.” You would set a link to “nofollow” in this way: <a href="http://www.example.com/" rel="nofollow">Anchor Text</a> if you want to suggest to Google that the hyperlink should not pass any link equity/SEO value to the link target.
Links of your site are SEO friendly.
Site passed plain text email test. No plain text email found.
Page have doc type.
Your site have 30 images without alt text.
Your site does not have any depreciated HTML tag.
HTML page size is > 100KB
GZIP compression is enabled.
Your site have 20 inline css.
Your site have 12 internal css.
Site failed micro data schema test.
| SL | Host | Class | TTL | Type | PRI | Target | IP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | goodjobcreations.jp | IN | 600 | A | 109.123.230.102 | ||
| 2 | goodjobcreations.jp | IN | 600 | A | 141.193.213.11 | ||
| 3 | goodjobcreations.jp | IN | 3600 | NS | ns75.domaincontrol.com | ||
| 4 | goodjobcreations.jp | IN | 3600 | NS | ns76.domaincontrol.com |
Site failed IP canonicalization test.
Site failed URL canonicalization test.
<link rel="canonical" href="https://mywebsite.com/home" /><link rel="canonical" href="https://www.mywebsite.com/home" />
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 0 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
0 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
0.1 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 186 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 43 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 15,085 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
2.3 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
31 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
1,176 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Potential savings of 780 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More
Aggregates all network requests and groups them by typeLearn More
Potential savings of 0 ms
Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles. Learn More
Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data. Learn More
Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes. Learn More
0 resources found
A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page. Learn More
Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn More
0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.
0.0 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive. Learn More
0 ms
Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance. Learn More
Potential savings of 290 KiB
Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time. Learn More
Potential savings of 43 KiB
Reduce unused rules from stylesheets and defer CSS not used for above-the-fold content to decrease bytes consumed by network activity. Learn More
Total size was 15,095 KiB
Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times. Learn More
0.5 s
Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this. Learn More
31 chains found
The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Learn More
1,176 elements
A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer Learn More
Potential savings of 230 ms
Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded. Learn More
Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time. Learn More
Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences. Learn More
0 ms
Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance. Learn More